Mod 6: Designed CATs for Classroom Assessment

This was another difficult project. Designing a CAT or classroom assessment technique takes a bit of thought. As Bruce stated in his Module 6 blog, you need background information from your students…I would certainly have them enter into a discussion board like Diigo, this type of information, in order to assess where they were at with their learning and why they took the class.  I would have them post some background information about what direction they are headed in with their studies in the future. It would seem prudent to get this information about them, before trying to assess what knowledge they have…after the first one or two modules.

Last quarter we developed our ability to create online assessment or self-help tools (a Google questionnaire) to help the students verbalize what they found difficult and what they would like changed, after each module. I believe that is a good place to start. In an article written on effective clicker questions, the University of Iowa stated Clickers should expose and clarify students’ misconceptions; promote discussion in large group case-based learning and act as a mock exam that gives immediate feedback, in order to assess the mastery of the content. This means that every question should identify what the students have or have not learned in the module being taught.

I think there are two effective ways to cover this territory: Twitter and Blogs. Tweeting is the CAT that would serve the purpose of immediate feedback, during a module (this doesn’t exclude emails which need to be encouraged when problems are encountered). Blogs can be used to assess the thought processes (meta-cognitive) and the results of the students’ ability to critically think about the material and apply the material learned, at the end of the module. Both of these CATs adapt themselves to online learning environments. The bottom line is asking what were the learning goals for that module and what kinds of responses do I expect from them? This moves the spotlight off what CATs a teacher uses to the more important question of what questions are being asked. Each CAT is only as useful as the questions asked.

Another useful CAT was demonstrated in our first eLearning course in a Voice Thread application. Students are encouraged to post comments on the Voice Thread project presented by the class or by the instructor. Sam gave us an example in his class voice thread on digital learners. This is an excellent way to get asynchronous feed back during the module. Skype can be used for a more private one on one discussion about what might be misunderstood by students, as well. The problem will be the ability of the student to feel safe enough to share with the instructor what information was problematic in each module. Anonymity most likely will promote sharing of this kind.

This is where a post board such as Wall Wishers for example could and may be used, also during the module to identify the “muddiest point” or problems within the course material.  If the students created a free email and used a name other than their own, they could post to the wall without giving their name. It would have to be postings with rules. Or not taking ownership for their words and thoughts might help them take a turn toward paths you would not like them to take. I will need to work with the board to determine whether I will actually use this along with blogs, Voice Thread, Twitter, emails and Skype.

The Cats I have chosen are the applications I have had to use as a student. I find they are valuable teaching assessment tools and prefer to stick with the CATs I know best…in the first few
online courses.  Finally I have displayed my check in points which are set before, during and after a module to help determine what needs changing and what other help the students may need to grasp the concepts. Each of the CATS should encourage group activity and discussion, just as they did during the courses I have taken on elearning.

Using the “muddiest point” technique can be done by using the Wall Wishers application. How it is done is stated in the video I have included.

4 thoughts on “Mod 6: Designed CATs for Classroom Assessment”

  1. Joy, your reflection about the use of Voice Thread in Sam’s class was an important point for me. I LOVE Voice Thread and considered using it as part of what I posted on my Mod6 blog but rejected it at the last minute. I think I will use it for Mod7 because it will fit right in to what I want my students to do. Thanks for the reminder! On another point, what you said about the CAT’s only being as useful as the questions asked, was a good observation. Well constructed questions DO help teachers AND students with their learning–whether that is the teacher learning about what the students are picking up or, the students learning about their own learning!

    Like

    1. Thanks for your comments Mary Ann. I am often discouraged and think the sacrifices I am making to be in this course or program may never change a thing for me. Then I hear some positive feedback and I get up from my pity pool, brush myself off and step out.

      Like

  2. Hi Joy,
    Mary Ann has already done my comments for me!
    I will note also that I appreciate your attention to how the CAT will work in the online environment. Not everyone is so completely focused there, as everyone needs to be. So you’re now modeling “expert behavior” in the class.

    The “Wall Wishers” tool looks like it’ll be endlessly useful for determining what students do/don’t know.

    Onward!!
    Robin

    Like

Leave a reply to elearningjoy Cancel reply