Module 7: Formative Assessment for the Student

This week there was another challenging blog to write on this weeks topic. My brain felt like it was on fire; because most of what I understand about self-regulating or assessing is subconscious. The bottom line of this assignment is reflected in article written by David J. Nicol and Debra MacFarlane-Dick entitled, Formative assessment and self regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice, it is “every student that continues through the program of a college or university is already self-assessing their work.” However without feedback from other students or a professor, they may not see what they could improve in their work. I am not even certain a rubric would give them the guidance they need. Several authors have stated rubrics are lacking when trying to use them to assess individualized writing.

Self regulated or assessed learning is not easy to define. In fact this week I had an example of that when I knew I had completed my assignment and thought I had done not only what was expected of me but more. I lost five points and did not understand what happened to cause the loss of points, for that module. Before, I was finished I had self-assessed everything I had done for that module. With fury in my eye, I confronted the instructor. After discussing the problem with her, I realized I had not named the module when I send her the email telling her which two blogs I had commented on. Therefore, she was unable to see that I had completed that part of the assignment.

This incident caused me to deeply contemplate not only what grades are; but, I started to question just exactly what self-assessment is. It seems I had been doing self-assessment during my university studies without being aware of what it was and that I was doing it. Most probably, my professors were using formative assessment as they guided me through the development of my thesis writing. Now when I think about it, I realize there is a lot more to it then I thought. Nicol and MacFarlane-Dick wrote:

Self regulation is manifested in the active monitoring and regulation of a number of different learning processes, e.g., the setting of and orientation towards, learning goals; the strategies used to achieve goals; the management of resources; the efforts exerted; reaction to external feedback; the products producted.

This means that as a student, I was aware of certain goals and expectations that I was to achieve while writing my master thesis and to get my master’s degree. I needed to compare what I was doing with what was expected of me, as stated in the course work given me and the expectations for the master’s degree I was seeking. I knew I would have to defend my thesis before my committee, not only what I had written and the resources I used; but the knowledge I had accumulated regarding the subject matter was also to be defended. Also, I would have to give an oral presentation about all the courses I had taken and answer the questions they were giving me regarding this information, thereby defending my position on the issues.

My committee was made up of the Dean of the Graduate School (my honor studies professor); the Chairman of the Political Science Department; my Criminology and Sociology Professor; and my political science student advising professor. Once my orals were completed and my thesis was finished and defended, I left the university to meet my family in Wisconsin. I did not attend the ceremonies and a few weeks later I received a letter from my committee and the graduate chair stating I had failed my orals and in my thesis writing and would not receive my degree. I immediately fired off a letter to the graduate chair and my committee telling them I had passed and that was nonsense. I knew I had not failed and could defend my position with them. Before that letter was ever received by them, my degree was sent to me.

At the time I did not have a rubric to assess my work and never heard of self-regulated learning and yet that was exactly what I did and was doing.  I knew I had met the requirements and was going to get the degree. I knew I had defended my paper extremely well and completed my orals with honors. I knew they were preparing me for something…but did not know what it was. It turned out that is what I had to do to get my entrance into the doctoral program approved, after it had been denied. I knew I would be able to convince them to take me. I had the grades and the desire to succeed in the program.

How does all this relate to our assignment? Somewhere in the learning process I was learning to self-regulate. That is exactly what I hope to move my students toward. Meta-cognitive blogs are great measurements of what is being learned and what is not and where one is in the whole process. In fact informative blogs are equally as good a tool since it forces the student to think about the concepts and issues presented in the modules. Also the class rubric while not ideal, since it was not created by the students, is a guiding tool to help them assess their strengths and weaknesses. It would be ideal if we could build our own class rubric; but there really isn’t enough time in 13 weeks to do this task.

Feedback to the students on meta-cognitive blogs and projects will help in the formative process and in their self-assessment. Feedback by other students serves to move the students toward self-assessment as well. I know when I get feedback that I don’t agree with, I still re-evaluate my thinking before I respond. Maybe the ideal form of feedback is best used in a questioning process…for example, why did you reach the conclusion you did?…etc. As Robin has stated in her blog, self-assessment skills are a process and it is not done or learned overnight.

Guiding questions help the student to understand what they might want to re-consider or improve upon. The whole idea is helping the learner to know where they are at in the learning process and where they need to go to accomplish the goals they have set for themselves and those the institiution is imposing on them. Once again, the ideal would be for them to be self directed enough that there are no insititutional requirements for their learning. But this idea is so far ahead of its time it is hard to even contemplate in the 21st century.

I learned to play the guitar like this teacher learned to play the dulcimer. When I lived in West Virginia I listened to all the very different instruments they used, including their own bodies; I found I loved the sound of the dulcimer the best!

6 thoughts on “Module 7: Formative Assessment for the Student”

  1. Every time, at the end of your blog-posting, there’s a little gift–a lovely,relevant video. That’s very nice for me.

    One comment: in grad school wouldn’t it have been nice for you to have known consciously that you were using all these self-regulated learning techniques? Because you are a student born-and-bred, you discovered these on your own, but at the time had no idea of what you were doing. Had you known, think of how much better you would have done, how much more in control of the situation you could have felt.

    Even so, I think you might still not be quite addressing the big idea I want everyone to get: when you teach self-assessment, you teach your students how to think like the teacher. Before you can teach that, you’ve got to uncover all the intuitive judgments you’re making–you’ve got to articulate those to yourself very clearly.

    Like

    1. I do not think I would have done better in the univeristy, having conceptualized the concepts of the big Ideas of backward design and self-assessment. I do agree with you that I would have felt more in control of my studies and research in the doctoral thesis area of international politics-national defense issues and would have challenged my committee, instead of dropping out of the program.

      I think I did get the big idea. Self directed learning and self-assessment is becoming your own teacher. I thought that was clear with the video on learning how to play a musical instrument. Maybe, I did not verbalize it well enough. I have stated more than once that teachers or instructors are facilitators in online learning courses. This implies that we facilitate the learning process of the students. They are their own teachers and instructors by taking control of their own learning and assessing their progress, once they make a commitment to learn course content.

      Like

      1. Being in control–to me that’s significant. I remember thinking, when Id finally gotten into my major courses, “There’s a door here and lots of people in this class have gone through it. I haven’t and I don’t know where the key is.”

        And yes, you have gotten the big idea.

        Like

      2. Thanks Robin. I hear what your saying. I got lucky and had professors ahead of their time. I found that key though and then walked away.

        Like

  2. Joy, I always feel good after I read your posts–you are definitely a “self-assessor par excellance”, you just have the added skill of wanting to work outside the box all the time! I admire your gumption, your ability to defend your opinions, and your willingness to fight for what you believe in! You are a spokesperson for what education should BE not what it IS! You go, girl!!

    Like

    1. Thank you Mary Ann. You are so supportive. There is a down side to thinking outside the box and fighting for ones rights and opinion. But, I thank you for those thoughts.

      We are moving into a new era in education and the drop out rates of high school children are not acceptable. If teachers don’t listen to what their non-verbal behavior is saying, we may lose a whole generation of young people.

      Like

Leave a comment